WFLA News Channel 8 The Tampa Tribune CentroTampa.com

Highlands Today

Print This Print Bookmark and Share

Highlands Today > News

Budget Hole Has Tax Exemptions In Sites Again

ADVERTISEMENT

Published: December 21, 2008

TALLAHASSEE - Businesses across Florida are carefully watching the Legislature with the deepening cash crisis facing state government leading to the most serious talk of eliminating some tax exemptions since former President John McKay took on the tax structure eight years ago.

Democrats and advocates for government programs that annually face a difficult time in the budget process have long suggested that Florida's hodge podge of exemptions to the sales tax are unfair and should be reviewed.

But with budget writers trying to figure out how to deal with a $2.3 billion deficit in the current year, there's widespread talk at the Capitol about whether the state might bring in a little more revenue by eliminating some of the 240-some-odd exemptions, deductions and credits to the sales tax.

In addition to Democrats, now some Republicans are talking about it too, though few are openly discussing details. One who is in favor of removing some exemptions is Sen. Jim King.

"Let's go through the sales tax exemptions and let's do away with those that we don't need," said King, R-Jacksonville, a former budget chairman, who was majority leader when McKay tried and failed to overhaul the tax structure in the early 2000s. King was also a new member of the Legislature in 1987 when lawmakers tried to raise revenue by adding many services to the sales tax, a move that later had to be repealed.

"I think everybody is focused in on the fact that we're on a quest for new money and I think a lot of people are going to more amenable to consider these things," King said.

And the effort may gain some momentum from an open-minded Senate President Jeff Atwater, R-North Palm Beach, who has said repeatedly that everything is up for consideration. On Florida Face to Face on the Florida Channel this week, Atwater reiterated that, and said specifically about tax exemptions that this spring with its budget challenges brings an "opportunity to look at the sales tax," for ways it might bring in more money.

King and Atwater join several Democrats in the House who are pushing for a line by line review of exemptions for possible repeal.

Rep. Scott Randolph contends much of the tax cutting that occurred during the eight years of the Bush administration actually consisted of new exemptions for "special interests."

"The best way to avoid tax increases on small business and the middle class is to close the loopholes that big corporate lobbyists have gotten their special interest clients over the years," said Randolph, D-Orlando.

Among the exemptions Randolph points to as potential targets, is bottled water. If it's sparkling mineral water, or water straight from the tap, you pay tax on it, but if it's regular bottled spring water, you don't. Rep. Rick Kriseman, D-St. Petersburg, has also suggested an end to the bottled water exemption.

It's difficult to say how much the more than 240 exemptions keep the state from collecting each year, because some exemptions overlap and sales of exempted products vary from year to year.

The list ranges from huge largely untouchable exemptions like residential rent and prescription drugs, which the Department of Revenue says cost the state about $1 billion each, to several whose value is so insignificant the agency doesn't even calculate the value. Among those is one of the whipping boys of those who think some exemptions ought to be removed: the tax free status of Super Bowl tickets when the game is held in Florida.

Other poster child tax exemptions include sky boxes at high school or college stadiums and ostrich feed.

By most accounts, there aren't any ostrich farms operating in Florida any more, so eliminating that exemption wouldn't generate any money, notes Florida Farm Bureau lobbyist Ben Parks.

"If we do have any ostrich farmers, I don't know about them," Parks said.

But farmers do depend on the exemption for feed for other livestock, and for their equipment - and need those exemptions to be able to compete with agribusinesses in other states where those items are tax free, Parks said.

Share this:
Loading Comments...
Loading
Print This Print Bookmark and Share
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement

IYP and SEO vendors: SEO by eLocalListing | Advertiser profiles
Oops! Your email could not be sent because of the following errors: